The exemplary work of the U.S. Money Reserve in giving investment advice

The U.S. Money Reserve has expressed an interest in helping the victims of the Hurricane Harvey to regain their states of life back. In as much as about 82 people died in the catastrophe, the number of the people displaced was way more than that. There is very little that the company can offer to the dead but a lot can be done to the ones displaced. Hundreds of thousands of the victims left their places of residence without any property. Learn more about US Money Reserve:

The people displaced do not have an idea how they will start on life. People with business lost properties that were worth billions of dollars. Receiving all these back may not be easy, but the companies that were not affected are working with the state government to assist where possible.

The U.S Money Reserve is calling upon the people of good will to come together and support the families and the Harvey residents that were affected by the hurricanes.

The collective purpose of the U.S. Money Reserve

Before the U.S. Money Reserve started off in the business of precious metals, it offered advice on different forms of investments and the right places to invest. The company offered professional views on how to set investment goals, the investment durations and the prospects of the investment choices.

Gaining the trust of the customers was one of the most remarkable things the company focused on. Because of its professionalism and the cooperation of the clients, the customers benefitted greatly from the pieces of advice that it gave to them.

Turning the trust into an investment

By the time that the U.S. Reserve decided to venture into the business of precious stones, it had already gained the trust of the customers that sought its advice. The investment choices came with a huge following since the organization had created a friendly relationship with the customers around. In reserve, the management and the customers operate more intimately.

The positive relationship created by the CEO has led a good working culture within the organization. The company started with less than 10000 customers in 2002. With the quality of its operations, the number of customers has escalated from 10000 to 400000 in about 15 years.

This achievement is not light. With the endorsement of the government, the number of customers is expected to rise in the future, and the operations could expand to other countries.

Read more: US Money Reserve | LinkedIn and US Money Reserve | Facebook


Lacey and Larkin Found a Migrant-Rights Fund

Michael Lacey and Jim Larkin are the co-founders of Phoenix New Times, a local newspaper, and Village Voice Media, a multimillion-dollar media conglomerate. Since the early 70s, the duo has challenged the ultra-conservative viewpoints of the Arizonan culture; in particular, its negative opinion about Latino migrants.

Nearly ten years ago, Lacey and Larkin stood against a local sheriff, who was hell-bent on erasing his name from their paper. What ensued was one of the most brutal attacks on the First Amendment in the last 20 years. The result of which ended with the duo being awarded a $3.75 million settlement.

The duo targeted Sheriff Arpaio unnatural behavior, making Arpaio very angry. The battle between the two sides lasted for a while until Arpaio completely crossed the line. His actions sparked national outrage; eventually leading to Lacey and Larkin establishing the Frontera Fund. Read more: Phoenix New Times | Wikipedia

The Lacey and Larkin Frontera Fund supports groups that fight for civil, human, and migrant rights in Arizona. Sadly, Arizona has a bad reputation for mistreating Latinos; especially if they migrated to this country. The duo views their victory against Arpaio as a step toward a better future for all migrants.

The details about Lacey and Larkin’s arrest continued to spill out until the court case ended. As the country found out more, their arrest sounded more like a gang-related kidnapping. Both men were dragged from their homes in the middle of the night and forced into unmarked SUVs. Then they were taken to separate jails, where Arpaio tried to break them.

The last nail in Arpaio’s coffin was his attempt to force the duo into giving up their employees and readers. Arpaio used false subpoenas, signed by a crooked prosecutor, to confiscate all notes and materials concerning his activities that Phoenix New Times reported.

It’s understandable why Sheriff hated Lacey and Larkin so much. Their paper wrote several articles about how horrible of a sheriff Arpaio was. In fairness, he was a terrible sheriff. Not because he couldn’t do the job, but because he abused his power. He abused Latino countless times, even unconstitutionally detaining them. He was even responsible the mistreatment and deaths of some of his jail inmates.

Thankfully, Phoenix New Times didn’t ignore Arpaio like everyone else did. No one wanted to talk about the wrong things that Arpaio did on a regular basis until Lacey and Larkin stood against him.

Immigrant and Human Rights Activism

Jim Larkin and Michael Lacey are co-founders of Village Voice Media as well as Phoenix New Times in addition to their journalist profession.

They dedicated their money from court settlement after their unlawful arrest ten years ago to organizations supporting migrant rights in Arizona through Lacey and Larkin Frontera Fund. Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio arrested the two after their expose on grand jury proceedings seeking articles and notes of reporters about the Sheriff.

Lacey and Larkin Frontera Fund supports organizations that fight for migrants, civil and human rights and civic participation and freedom of speech in the state of Arizona. They won the case after their argument of fighting for the implementation of the First Amendment was accepted by the court.

National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights aims at defending the rights of refugees or immigrants regardless of their status. Their primarily call is the recognition of immigrant rights as human rights the world over. Learn more about Michael Lacey: and

The organization was founded in 1986 and since then has been able to absorb membership from many immigrant groups and communities and they continually forge alliances and partnerships with like-minded institutions that support the cause for a just and economically empowered society with immigrants.

American Civil Liberties Union shoulders the biggest civil litigation in the whole of US. It’s a project established in 1920 that seeks to achieve its objectives of protection of human rights of immigrants through litigation, outreach, and advocacy. They have over time challenged laws that inhibit immigrants’ equal access to the judicial system. Read more: Michael Lacey | Facebook

The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights is a leader in its own right for immigrant individuals and families in California. They are agents for the realization of democratic participation of immigrants and their right to movement.

Their key vision is for a society that will accept migrants as equals and offer opportunities for their participation in nation building. It was formed in 1986 after the enactment of Immigration Reform and Control Act. Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights wants to change public opinion through policies of full immigrant, human and civil rights adoption.

The Advocates for Human Rights is another organization that has been active for over 30 years globally fighting for change from local, regional to the global level. They seek to establish international standards of treatment of immigrants and respect for human rights the world over. Advocates for Human Rights work with partners, staff and volunteers in their programs to make a change in the world.

Partners include donor foundations, government institutions, and individuals that share the common vision of seeing a just world with equal opportunities for everyone regardless of their nationality or social standing.

Amazon Watch is a San Francisco based human rights organization working in the Amazon basin. They primarily focus on the advancement of the rights of indigenous people in the Amazon basin.

They work hand in hand with environmental organizations in those specific areas. Oil and gas pipeline project and other large scale projects have threatened the lifestyle of indigenous people and hence the organization’s activism seeking to protect infringed rights of the people.

What Thor Halvorssen Thinks of Socialism

People of rivaling political viewpoints generally want what is best for the nation. They have chosen their particular point of view, because they believe that it will result in prosperity for the United States. However, they believe that other points of view will result in disaster. Rivaling political systems all have their benefits, because they are based on the principle that the nation is to prosper. They all have their weaknesses as well, and some are significantly weaker than others. Mr. Thor Halvorssen believes that socialism is a detrimentally weaker economic system than capitalism.


Halvorssen prefers a free market economy because there is no limit to the amount of money that can pour into the economy. The rich will continue to accrue wealth, but so will everybody else. The middle class will ascend and the lower class will ascend. That is why the poor of the United States are better off than the poor of the people throughout the rest of the world. In contrast, there is a finite about of money in a socialistic model of the economy. That is why Bernie Sanders is so fond of spreading everything out evenly. He thinks that money is finite, and everybody deserves their share. But if it is infinite, their share will continually expand.


The reason that many millennials are overcome by the philosophy of socialism is that they do not know anything about the history of socialism. They might be able to point to a few contemporary nations. But if you want to know how socialism will work in the United States, you need to only ask how it has worked in previously nations. Upon conducting such an investigation, you will quickly learn that socialism has yielded a lot more bad fruit than good fruit.
Halvorssen is very balanced in his assessment. He freely acknowledges that there are prosperous countries with socialist economic policies. But, he thinks that these polices are not optimal and one should prefer free market trade.

More information for Thor Halvorssen: